Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(64)
-
▼
October
(40)
- Upgrades For Sea King Mk42B & Ka-28PL
- Mobile Calibrator for Avionics & Instrumentation O...
- Su-30MKI's Russia-Origin Air-to-Ground Weapons
- CABS’ AEW & CS Detailed
- EADS' A319MPA Detailed
- Boeing’s P-8I MMA Detailed
- Ex Malabar 2008 Reveals Indian Navy's Shipborne EW...
- Pakistan Army's MBTs Detailed
- Eyes In The Sky: Part-1
- Making Sense From Nonsense
- EADS-Built MR/ASW Platforms On Offer To The Indian...
- Navy’s Own MRUAV Takes Shape
- The Indian Navy’s CIWS Saga
- Akash E-SHORADS Explained: Part 2
- Akash E-SHORADS Explained: Part 1
- Farcical Trials
- RBE-2 AESA Revealed
- IL-76MF's Turbofan Options
- Vympel's R-27 & R-73 AAMs
- Rocket Artillery Firepower Being Enhanced
- R-77 Is Superior To Mica-EM
- Vympel's R-77 BVRAAM Revealed
- Russian Torpedoes For Indian Navy
- Kaveri Turbofan For 'Tejas' LCA
- AW-101 for VVIP Transportation
- Gripen IN Prevails
- MIDHANI-Developed Alloys For Tejas LCA & Kaveri Tu...
- What It Takes To Wage ASW In Shallow Waters
- Phazotron JSC's Airborne Radars
- AIP For SSKs
- Su-30MKI's Specified Warload
- China's C-602 ASCM Detailed
- IL-78MKI-90 Detailed
- The FGFA Conundrum Explained
- I Was Right, Afterall
- ‘Esoteric’ Airpower Issues
- EW Suites Of The Indian Navy Detailed
- Mi-17V-5 Still In Great Demand
- Enter The SMX-22 SSK
- Fine Tuning Of India’s Field Artillery Requirement...
-
▼
October
(40)
15 comments:
yawn, now you have started to bore me.
instead of posting one after another brochures, write some quality analysis.
you are better then that.
Thanks for your vote of confidence.
By the way, the illustrations are not from brochures. You won't find them being distributed anywhere in the open domain. But they are worth a thousand words, hence the absence of any commentary or analysis.
no, i am serious boss.
despite of what people say, i like to read analysis by you in this field.
but it should be analysis, instead of cut paste pics.
quality matter over quantity.
oops, i missed your second comment.
but take my views in a positive way.
OK yaar, will be posting some 'analysis' for you within the next few hours. Khush?
Sid, am working on Part 2 of India's field artillery modernisation efforts, and will post it within the next 4 hours. Also working on an analysis of the two new Vympel AAMs--R-177 & R-95) that were last year proposed for co-development with the DRDO (just like what MBDA has done with the Astra AAM project.
A big thanks.
Sid
i prefer the brochures. nice, crisp and to the point.
prasun continue with this pls imstead of tx heavy posts.
to prasun
prasun also post about mica IR VS
AA10 IR
some people have phobia that whatever electronics russia makes is worst than western counter parts
someone called r 77 radar seeker older compared to mica in su30mki
section u posted
but its a good seeker has traking
range of 10NM against
0.01meter square RCS
r 77 is capable of engaging other
air to air missiles and even guided munitions but that guy was not ready to beleive
i asked him about the price of MICA compared to aa10
there r more aa12,aim120c than MICA
cuz MICAS just unaffordable the capability they provide is inferior
and price is too high
to prasun
what about future russian and US
ramjet missiles competing meteor
any new BROChURES
Got technical presentations on the R-177 and R-95 AAMs along with technical data on their active seekers. Will upload them gradually. No rush.
to sengupta
what about comparision between MICA IR and AA10 IR
I don't have that comparison chart as yet. But the engagement envelope of the R-27ET is definitely much more than that of the Mica-IR. That was confirmed almost 10 years ago. That's because the Mica-IR is used for close combat within visual range, whereas the R-27ET is used in conjunction with the R-27ER, i.e. a salvo firing against the target. It is a unique and well-known air combat tactic when engaging targets well beyond visual range. This was demonstrated by the Russians way back in the late 1990s to Boeing, which then programmed this scenario into one of the F-15E tactical flying simulators. Two years ago the IAF was contemplating using the R-27ETs on its Mirage 2000s and replacing the older Matra R550 Magic-2 AAMs.
to prasun
if r 77 has greater range than MICA then aa10 has greater range then r77 its so simple to under stand
also IAF uses AA10 IR on mki
but some people argue that
MICA IR has better range but i don't beleive in that
NO one bought MICA IR
IAF alredy has almost 2000 aa10 missiles
PLEASE IN future if u have some brochures about this please post those AA10 IR VS MICA IR
Post a Comment